« Home | An interesting thought » | Jon Stewart mixes the best Sarah Palin moments » | Auto Bailout figures explained » | Citibank comes late to the party » | SNL -- Looking for new sketch material-- lights on... » | Palin alert: New definitions of "turkey" » | Madame Secretary... » | "You-must-be-[Mile]-High club" » | MO shows us it's no bellwether state » | Minnesota: Franken vs Coleman update? There is no... »

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Which Foreign Policy appointments really matter?

Spencer Ackerman of Washington Independent has a offbeat look at the foreign policy posts where actual stuff is accomplished:
But all the focus on who will sit in Obama’s cabinet overlooks a basic fact of governance. Much, if not most, of the actual substance of policy — from its detailed conception to its experimentation to its implementation — doesn’t come from the heads of the federal agencies. It comes from deep in their guts."
This is particularly true for national security and foreign policy. When it comes to managing foreign relations and securing the country, the middle-to-upper-middle tiers of the Departments of State, Defense and Justice, along with the National Security Council staff and the intelligence community, are often critical posts. Those positions are policy laboratories and career boosters, offices where policy is refined and offices where policy gets killed by poor implementation or bureaucratic machination. As one Democratic foreign-policy expert recently put it, “These are your foreign-policy change agents.”

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home